Search This Blog

Saturday, February 27, 2016

The Nobody Wins Budget of 2016-17

The people of this great Nation are eagerly looking forward to the Budget for 2016-17 being proposed by the Modi government on the 29th of this month. Obviously, expectations are running high and hundreds of learned men have aired their solicited and unsolicited views to the Finance Minister in the hope of catching his attention. He must be thoroughly confused. I can't blame him if he is and I don't wish to confuse him with my two bits on saving the economy either. Don't you for one second believe that the views of the people are not heard, especially if they sound anti-national. Now what falls under anti-national is a different matter. I don't know if the BBC would be called anti-Indian now for carrying an article

"How 'black money' saved the Indian economy". Maybe, on the other hand, the Govt. may look at it as a face saver for it has successfully failed in driving this evil out of the Indian monetary system.   


The next financial year (2016-17) will in effect be the half way mark for the Government. Like in a T-20 match, the half way mark always decides how the match will end up. If the first year would be called "hope" the second year would earn the title of "despair". The third year can look forward to being the "turning point" irrespective of the way the economy goes. The Foreign Institutional Investors, or as lovingly called the FIIs have already started walking out blaming the global investment and local intolerant climate for the Modi inning going bad. The local money bags too are too busy spending money on having fun as no work is getting done, and that is being reflected in the bad IIP, inflation and export numbers on the scoreboard.

When Mr. Modi's team came on to the Parliament pitch in 2014, it looked liked it would win the match hands down based on the numbers it had, the opposition earning the tag of "minnows". Well then, the performance so far has been just like that of the Indian team, which always looks great on paper, but fails to deliver when required, and even manages to lose winning matches against the weakest of opponents.

From a cricketing comparison point of view, the "Modi Warriors" have played some very unnecessary and crazy shots that have impacted its performance rate and loss of time. It does not look like the team Captain read the weather and pitch conditions correctly to have ended up in the current situation. The strategic time out is over. On 29th morning, we shall all know of what strategies have been employed to put this Nation back on the rails again. If the Rail budget was any indicator, then the Govt. has foretold a play safe budget.

What can it do? Tax the rich and spare the poor? The super rich in India are super athletic in out running the tax man, and the really super rich wear the super cloak to make them immune and invisible. The poor are always kept poor as they form the vote bank, and each year the exemption limit is raised to keep out about 15% of the population from registering themselves with the tax authorities. Is it not a miracle that the 7th largest Global GDP has less than 3% of its population in the tax paying net? If one goes by statistics, India saw domestic sales of  2.60 million passenger cars in 2014-15 and a reduction of 0.7 million taxpayers for the same year. Great Country where even the poor drive cars and the world wants to know why we keep moaning.

Okay, so adding tax payer in the poor little rich Nation is a super hard task just like finding the right fast bowler. How about betting on reforms? I was laughed at when I asked a knowledgeable banker on this subject and was told that this Govt. has a major task ahead of reforming itself first. It is true that the PM has had a poor home record versus very successful overseas, very unlike that of the Indian cricket team. But, he should learn from the Indian cricket players that all that matters is always winning at home with a few odd victories overseas, as the selectors and big buck sponsors are here and not really overseas. No wonder IPL is now possibly the second biggest cricketing event in the world.

Next month, the world's eyes will be on India. Not for its economy as much as the fact that the T-20 cricket world cup is being played in India. The question next month would be if India would win back the T-20 cup from the 2014 champions Sri Lanka who were not the favourites then and appear to be a much weaker team now. But the issue for this month is - will the Modi team deliver a winning budget this year or pave the way to leave this Nation worse off than the previous Govt. did.


Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Unease of doing business

Okay, so the "Make in India" (MII) week got over on the 18th of Feb. 2016. The next day, there were press announcements of it being a resounding success. Over US$220 Billion dollars worth of investment committed with signed Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs). Now that is really one heck of an achievement if it does materialize. One may ask why are Indians so sceptical of handling "acchi khabar" (good news). No wonder we are nowhere close to achieving the "acche din" (good days) promised by our "Acche Pradhan Mantriji" (Good Prime Minister). After all, he always believed he will have the last laugh when his chips were down, and if no one else in India, at least, he and his party are experiencing not just good but great days, until recently of course.


There is actually a very good  reason why people believe that most of the MOUs signed will go up in flames just as the stage to open the event did. Most believe that MII was nothing more than a super hyped up version of  the "Vibrant Gujarat" event that became the signature of Mr. Modi's govt. when he was Chief Minister of the State; which in turn was a souped up version of the "Pravasi Bhartiya Divas" initiated by Mr. Modi's mentor, Mr. A. B. Vajpayee, the ex-Prime Minister of India. (Some say both were Modi's idea as both saw light of day in the year 2003). Both these events had a similar purpose. Attracting foreign and domestic capital as investments. The track record shows a dismal 13% conversion from paper to reality. With no real transparency on what exactly was signed and in which sector, it is hard to say if the sceptics will be proven right or not.

ppp ranking 2020The most optimistic do not see more than 25% of the US$ 220 billion actually rooting itself here for other reasons. First of all, most foreign companies that showed up were interested in the energy, aviation or defense sectors, none of them easy as it's not "sell to India" but "make in India", which entails technology transfer. Second, assuming that's not the case, (after all over 2,500 international and 8,000 domestic companies are claimed to have participated in the week-long multi- sectoral industrial event, apart foreign government delegations from 68 countries and business teams from 72 nations), the fabric of the much touted resurgent "India Story" has begun to definitely tear with growing intolerance,violent unrests, ad-hoc and arbitrary statutory demands on business, regression of reforms, higher levels of crime and corruption, opposition from govt.'s own alliance partners, bureaucratic hurdles and above all no change in the ease of doing business despite the government claiming "all is well". For a Nation that will occupy a place in the top 10 GDPs globally, occupying the 130th  spot out of 189 countries is hardly an accomplishment. 

India is not shining but burning and the blame falls squarely on the government that has proved so far to be inept at handling matters despite posting a massive majority in the elections some 2 years back. Global slump may be part of the problem, but that should have theoretically put India in the pole position. The business and the investment community in general must see it some other way. The pre-budget market crash today is a clear reflection of their growing concern that India is not looking at any "good times" any time soon. 

I don't have any advice for the Nation's decision makers. I think they are better placed to advise themselves. The unease being felt by the economy has now gone beyond what could have been checked within the system itself. The frustration on the street is a different situation altogether and that is a greater unease that cannot be tamed with a high and mighty hand. 



Feb 16 2016 : The Times of India (Mumbai)
TOI INTERVIEW - 

`Govts have a controlling mindset

Ease of doing biz hasn't improved'


Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy tells TOI's Sagarika Ghose that Make in India, etc are good ideas but change in India takes time. He adds that fast economic progress cannot be made if every citizen does not feel enthusiastic

http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31804&articlexml=TOI-INTERVIEW-Govts-have-a-controlling-mindset-Ease-16022016015038


Well come to "Magnetic Maharashtra"
yes, it's not a real welcome.
It's really the "Make in India" week
cleverly we have in it, our own agenda sneak. 
We promise to make doing business easy here
as long as nothing you absolutely fear. 

A single window clearance we have 
that is, if you can find the right one.
We have agents to give you all the right help
without them you will cry and yelp.
We have land labour capital enterprise in plenty
For that we ask our share of just water and tea

Set up a business - don't ask how much time
tell us instead - How much (you can give of course). 
We have limited time to get rich,
our palms have the 5-year itch.
Strictly on "Kayedeeya pramane*" principle we work,
to open corruption we hardly shirk.

Invest on paper and take it all back
Our bankers will tell you how to get away.
This is a very progressive State
except for farmers who go Late.
Come talk to us - we are waiting for you
If nothing else, come build a public loo.

* Legal way




Saturday, February 20, 2016

In the long* run we are all dead.






ex machinaCan you imagine that in the next 15 years all cars would be driverless? Or that all our white good at home would talk to each other and eliminate the need for any human house helps? Maybe at some stage, they would even fix themselves. With Internet of things (IOT) not improbable. Expanding this thought, mail, milk, pizza and shop purchases would be delivered to us by drones, no deliverymen of any kind required. Streets would be monitored by intelligent cameras and streets patrolled by robocop. Why just houses, factories and offices too would have no need for any human workforce. Homes would be 3-D printed, as would car and machine parts... maybe even human body parts printed at home. Science has left nothing in the realm of "impossible" in the age of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR). Even carnal gratification with robotic sex.  

All of the above may or may not happen by 2020, but by 2030, it will surely be a reality. That is if the human race does not end itself and "Mama Earth" before then. The 4IR took centre stage at the World Economic Forum (WEF) this year as developments in this period have very radical implications for humans, and rightly so. Cheap labour is no longer required to be competitive. Disruption in manufacturing techniques, supply-chain logistics, material extraction and handling, back office and administration processes, retailing and distribution, communication is changing the way we work and live. The efficiency, in fact, is a result of doing away with human intervention. 



The situation gets even graver when labour intensive countries like China and India look at automation as a panacea for industrial growth. China is already on its way to convert its existing factory floors to operate with 50% less labour than now. India is looking at becoming the world's next industrial hub, and most of the foreign investment planning to set shop here is eyeing the large Indian consumer market, and not the cheap labour for its investment decision. India too seems to be in an obliging mood. Robots will certainly not fall under the skewed labour laws that refuse to change for reasons of political appeasement. The other matter is that protected cheap labour does not equate to efficient skilled labour either. While India may lag behind on that front, ironic as it may sound, will in a few years, certainly become a leader in producing efficient cheap robots to replace human workers.      

The question on everyone's mind is that if automation will take away 90% of the jobs as we know them now, what is human population going to do? The Utopian thought that Man will use his "unemployment" gainfully to do all the things that were otherwise impossible with a regular job is a weed induced dream. Man's mind without gainful occupation would be the true equivalent of the Devil's workshop and function that way. There is general agreement that unemployment and rising income disparity are the primary reasons for the rise in the world's crime and terror charts. 

The larger question, of course, is that of economics. Man's happiness is directly linked to his earnings. No work equals no earnings. How does he then buy food, clothing, shelter, holidays, and all the beautiful things produced for him by those fantastic automated factories? 


One may say that the same questions were asked by those affected by the first industrial revolution, and did apocalypse happen? If it did not happen then, it will not happen now nor in the future. Even if it does, as John Maynard Keynes had said: "In the long run, we are all dead". Now how long is long? 



The First Industrial Revolution (1840-170) used water and steam power to mechanise production. The Second (1870 - 1910) used electric power to create mass-production. The Third (1950 - 2010) used electronics and information technology to automate production. Now a Fourth Industrial Revolution (2010 - ) is building on the Third, the digital revolution that has been occurring since the middle of the last century. It is characterised by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.

I wonder if:

1. Robots as police will be more effective in curbing crime and be incorruptible?
2. Robots as civil servants increase administrative efficiency?
3. Robots as sex workers reduce human trafficing?
4. Robots as doctors improve health care at much lower costs?
5. Robots as wealth managers offer unbiased advice to clients?
6. Robots as chefs improve culinary experiences? 
7. Robots as lawyers or judges would dispense better justice?
8. Robots as soldiers, is it a good idea? 
9. Robots as pets would replace the ones we have now?




The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond


The true meaning of “In the long run we are all dead”


Tata Motors to launch India's first indigenous robot - Tata Brabo


http://qz.com/611193/watch-this-robot-learned-to-mix-drinks-by-imitating-humans/

Intelligent Machines: The jobs robots will steal first

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Playing God and Becoming One.






The thought of colonizing Mars is no longer hypothetical. Agencies like NASA have set dates and has a clear plan for inducing it. 2030, that's not too far out in the future. Keeping that in mind, NASA and several other space agencies are recruiting the first colonizers ready on a one-way trip to Mars.

What if life on earth too began the same way? Then, would humans be considered as Gods for the life forms that evolve there? Is this human tendency to play God by conquering nature a genetic trait implanted in us by our own creator? Is this the reason why humans as a species are the only one on earth with a consciousness? Finally, did the first crossover humans turn against and destroy or drive off our own creators from the earth in an experiment gone wrong?

Science believes that "Humans did not evolve from apes, gorillas or chimps. We are all modern species that have followed different evolutionary paths, though humans share a common ancestor with some primates, such as the African ape. The timeline of human evolution is long and controversial, with significant gaps. Experts do not agree on many of the start and end points of various species". Are these gaps then attributable to external intervention? 

Chinese Gods, except for Buddha. Who was NOT a God
With advancement in robotics and artificial intelligence, I wonder if it would be necessary to send a human to Mars first. Would biological machines prepare the right terrain and environment fit enough to support human and animal life?  Then, come to think of it, why do we need to waste resources to convert a hostile enviornment to comfortable, when our intelligent robots would just thrive in Mar's existing eco-system? Robots could extract natural resources, manufacture goods, grow and process food, and do all the nice things we want to do on the red planet. Factually, intelligent robots would not require human intervention to begin with as they would be stronger, more efficientself-learningself-fixing, more intelligent and even self-propagating  machines that could be productive forever. All they would need is some form of powering up like we energy from food. If solar and wind are not enough to fulfill the need, then I am sure they will learn how to overcome the situation like we, their Gods did. What if; just what if; they discover that humans make a great source of power. That is, once it dawns on them that we need them to sustain ourselves, but they have no other use for us. Remember the movie Matrix?   
Gods:


Gods around the world
Ultimately, the God of things is always cleverer. Look at us, we humans from the start of civilization, do worship our own creators in the glorified human form we can relate to. Man may probably ensure that his creations accord him the same level of respect by creating a form that his creations would understand. Right on! Man will transform himself into a super mechanoid and stake his claim to immortality like our own Gods have. Far fetched written on dope you think? I would not be the first to be accused of it. 



Mesopotamian Gods And Goddesses List | Sumeriam+gods+and+goddesses.png:
NASA plan to SEND LIFE to Mars to create oxygen before human colonisation

IF LIFE is not discovered on Mars any time soon it could be SENT there instead, NASA have said.

Why Haven't All Primates Evolved into Humans?


Saturday, February 6, 2016

The ART of Living ArtiFICIALLY

Pic. credit: http://www.reasons.org/rtb-101/artificial-life
A couple of days back, I read that the UK has given a go ahead for genetic modification of human embryos with some caveats attached, paving the way for what are being called "designer" babies. I wish this was around when I was in an embryonic stage for more than one reason. Now, have money, get a super child. Wouldn't that be great? Live out your own perfect dreams through your own perfect children. But, would that make your own life perfect I wonder? 

Keeping theological and ethical debates aside, would genetically modified babies give rise to an entirely new species? We may be the new apes for them I suppose. Just think of it, vastly superior in brain and brawn, what if that new species decided to treat the existing human race as we treat our own animal ancestors in labs. PETA may be replaced by PETH in a few decades then. 

Since enternity, as we know it, Man's evolution has been nurtured by His desire to perfect his world. The world He was born ito, imperfect. Despite most humans professing affinity to some form of religion, the race has systematically and gradually moved up the ladder to take over as much of  "God's" terrain, acting passively or destructively, whatever it takes to become one with the creator. Natural was never good enough for mankind. From creating artifical skins to endure unnatural weather to starting a fire to consume unnatural food Man has come a long way.  Synthetic food , artificially sculpted bodies (let your imagination run wild here), artificially incubated babies (test tube fertilization), artificial intelligence and genetic modification, all tick marked as achieved. The next race would be half man half machine, able to do many things imaginable but impossible today, and theoretically immortal with consciouness downloads to hard drives becoming possible. (Now, I may live long enough to see that happening and possibly download my consciousness other than through blogs). By the way every Hindu worth his "vedas" would vouch for the immortality bit. We are just catching up with our past and not the future if Hindu mythology is to be believed, and there is lesser reason not to. 

Human evolution has been possible because of its quest for understanding and truth, even if the latter is a big lie. Humanity has kept pushing every barrier in its way with each "new truth" leaving it with a million more questions to answer. Has it pushed its luck too far? No distance seems too far for mankind, and each of its giant step makes this world more and more artificial to counter the limited support that nature can offer. No this blog has not been written after a high dose of natural weed or any artificial substance abuse.  We may not like it, but we the lucky ones have reached a point where living artificially is the new natural and there is no real God to help us.